Resources


Follow us on Twitter

View Ty Hardison's profile on LinkedIn

Blogroll


Tags


From Imaged to Paperless Checks

Posted on March 4, 2010 18:36 by Ty Hardison

Paper checks don’t remain as paper very long. In today’s digital age, they are quickly imaged so they can be electronically cleared and settled.

Converting paper to digital images became law in 2003 with the passage of the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (Check21) and the initial implementation meant large companies and banks didn’t have to ship paper all around the country.

Today, more and more of the paper check imaging is being done by merchants and businesses that accept them. Community banks led the way in deploying remote-deposit check scanners as a way to offset the competitive advantage mega banks had with their branch network. By scanning and electronically depositing check images, community banks were able to attract business customers and businesses could choose a bank not just for the convenience of the physical branch to make paper check deposits.

Some businesses image checks one at a time at the point of sale while others use industrial check scanners that can image hundreds of checks a minute in the back office. Check imaging is now incorporated into ATM deposit functions and there are even apps available using your smart phone’s camera to snap a photo and deposit a check.

We’ve come a long way in seven years. But a big question remains. Why do we even have to write a “paper” check in the first place, why not just start with the image?

Is the industry ready for next evolution in check technology?

The inventor of the paperless check, Global Standard Financial, Inc, (GSF) thinks so. Clark Gilder, CEO of GSF points to a Fed policy paper published in November 2009 titled Digital Checks as Electronic Payment Orders (EPO) that agrees with him.

The Fed writes that “a digital check EPO could leverage the existing electronic check infrastructure and provide a convenient, low-cost payment option for both consumers and businesses, based on a payment method that they have found useful for many years.”

GSF announced that they had been awarded two US patents covering the fundamental processes necessary to securely create a paperless check (GSF describes these pure electronic payments as Digitally Originated Checks™ or "DOCs") ahead of the big banking show (http://www.bai.org/) this week.  To see the GSF patent, go to http://bit.ly/DOC_Patent.

As an alternative payment, keeping all the benefits of writing a check yet eliminating the need to start with a piece of paper has enormous implications for business models from peer-to-peer payments and gift giving to B2B invoices and payments to government and merchants.  And accepting paperless checks would costs much less than accepting a debit card today, something businesses and merchants should be enthusiastic about. In fact, instead of pushing Interchange legislation, they should push Congress to adopt revisions to the Check 21 law to secure paperless checks legal standing.

Of course, the security demands of both banks and check writers are a key consideration in any new payment method.  While the volume of paper checks is starting to decline, the growth in paper check fraud continues. Forgers can easily alter the dollar amount of a paper check and simple signatures are the standard authentication mechanism. Clearly sophisticated fraud technologies, electronic signatures and encryption can greatly enhance security. GSF employees these as well as providing additional security using digital rights management features and unique per check identification codes. In terms of security, these enhanced measures make paperless check fraud much more complex to perpetrate.

Over the years, the Federal Reserve has gone about the business of eliminating expensive paper processing after the check was written. Now it is the time to extend the benefits of digital checks all the way to the check writer. With the Fed and ECCHO (the check clearing trade association) endorsing the paperless check concept and the know how and technology available, its just a matter of time before we will all be carrying a check book again, except this time it will be digital and on our smart phone.

Share it!

If you like this article then share it with your friends and peers.

From Imaged to Paperless ChecksTweet This!Digg It!TechnoratiBizSugar!

No Interchange reform legislation in 2010

Posted on February 28, 2010 03:40 by Ty Hardison

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank announced his committee would not take up Interchange legislation this year.   However there are steps that small businesses, family-owned restaurants, local retailers and service providers can take to help themselves without waiting on the government.

Immediately switch to an Interchange pass-through pricing plan.  For example, effective October 2010, Visa will extend Small Ticket Interchange to most merchants.  This is an effective reduction in the overall Interchange costs for most merchants.  However, few merchants will benefit since there is no difference between a transaction over or under $15 in their current merchant account contract.  In fact this is just one example.  Most merchants are not getting the benefit of all the incentives Interchange rates available including credit voucher Interchange.  Bundled, blended, “rate as low as” pricing structures, where merchants pay non-qualified surcharges, are unable to realize lower costs on transactions that meet the specified criteria for certain Interchange categories.

Conduct a Google search using keywords "merchant Interchange rate quote" or visit http://merchantrates.com to get an instant quote.  Also consider the tips on how to lower your real rate to accept card payments at http://myrealrate.com/lower-my-real-rate.aspx and while you are there benchmark your card acceptance costs with other businesses of your same size and in your same industry.  A little study will go a long way.

As far as Interchange legislation is concerned, I expect it will continue to be big business for lobbyist on both sides of the issue.  I however am concerned about government intervention. I have zero confidence that the politicians can come up with a better solution than the market.  Because there is money to be made, there are lots of innovative companies developing new payment technologies and more secure systems that are attracting venture capital within the payments space.  Now is not the time to overly regulate as this tends to benefit the incumbents and stifle innovation.  I am also skeptical that the small businesses will out negotiate huge national chains or community banks will out negotiate to big to fail banks when the lobbyist and politicians get together in the back room.

In November 2009, the US Government Accountability Office report indicated that new government imposed regulations on payment card Interchange fees would be difficult to implement, with any benefits hard to measure.   Merchants may be better off championing alternative payment solutions than risk the dangers of unintended consequences asking the government to get involved.

Share it!

If you like this article then share it with your friends and peers.

No Interchange reform legislation in 2010Tweet This!Digg It!TechnoratiBizSugar!

Strategy to Advance Contactless

Posted on February 23, 2010 16:18 by Ty Hardison

In an article on Digital Transactions “Could Visa’s New No-Signature Rule Hurt Contactless Payments?” it was argued that Visa’s expansion of its policy to no longer require signatures for transactions less than $25 for most U.S. merchants would undermine contactless payments.

In our blog post Visa Changes Debit Debate, Backs Contactless, we suggested that extending Visa's No Signature Required (NSR) program (on transactions <$25) to most merchants (along with converging signature and PIN debit rates and expanding small ticket Interchange on transactions <$15) were policies that supported contactless payments.

Changing ingrained behavior takes time and doing it in steps makes sense.  Step one, training merchants and cardholders that neither a signature nor PIN are needed to authenticate a transaction.  And we agree with Visa who states “the No Signature Program is often an initial first step, while an upgrade to contactless acceptance offers merchants the ability to accept a new generation of chip-enabled payment products…that also offer speed and convenience at the POS.”

As consumers become accustom to faster transaction times, they will come to expect a different experience at the POS.  Ultimately I believe that consumer demand will drive merchant adoption of contactless payments.  And innovation will accelerate as consumers continue the rapid adoption of smart phones and social networking combined with continued investments in contactless and NFC technology in both payment and identity management.  Finally contactless will be needed in the U.S. to advance security and global interoperability issues.  These important issues will continue to drive policy.

Share it!

If you like this article then share it with your friends and peers.

Strategy to Advance ContactlessTweet This!Digg It!TechnoratiBizSugar!

Visa Changes Debit Debate, Backs Contactless

Posted on February 14, 2010 12:15 by Ty Hardison

Visa changes the signature vs. PIN debit debate with policies to support contactless payments. 

In an interview in the June/July 2009 issue of Cards&Payments magazine, Ellen Richey, global head of enterprise risk for Visa, discussed the adoption of chip technology to make purchases more secure. Richey said “the U.S is not going to be adopting a chip-and-PIN credit card or debit card any time in the very near future” suggesting that in the U.S., the deployment of a contactless-chip card network may not include a PIN component.

In October 2009, Best Buy announced that it would discontinue it’s acceptance of Visa contactless payment cards. Why?  Best Buy reportedly took issue that Visa contactless lacked the option of PIN acceptance, while payment industry analyst pointed to the controversy of Visa allegedly pushing signature-based transactions over PIN transactions in an effort to generate higher Interchange fees.

In an interesting twist, Visa announced that signature debit and Interlink PIN debit rates will both change starting April 2010 – they will be priced the same.  Additionally, Visa is set to expand its small ticket Interchange (on transactions <$15) as well as extend its No Signature Required (NSR) program (on transactions <$25) to most merchants. 

This certainly is an effective strategy for changing the debate on steering purchases to and from signature debit or PIN debit.  And if Visa’s strategy to deal with security and global interoperability issues is for the U.S. to adopt contactless-chip technology, then eliminating price differences between signature and PIN debit will also alleviate the need for contactless to have a PIN option (Best Buy’s concern).

Many were already predicting 2010 to be a breakout year for contactless payments (from contactless stickers to NFC enabled phones).  With these Visa developments, merchants may want to consider adding contactless card readers over PIN pads at their point of sale.

Share it!

If you like this article then share it with your friends and peers.

Visa Changes Debit Debate, Backs ContactlessTweet This!Digg It!TechnoratiBizSugar!

Visa's Debit Rates Converge

Posted on February 13, 2010 01:11 by Ty Hardison

Visa has announced additional changes for April 2010.  Visa will adjust the following U.S. Visa Debit Interchange reimbursement fees.  The significance here is that for many merchants the underlying Interchange costs for accepting a Visa signature debit (check card) will be the same as accepting a PIN debit transaction. 

Visa Signature Debit

Fee Program
Current Fee
April 2010 Fee

CPS Retail Debit
1.03% + $0.15
 0.95% + $0.20

CPS Supermarket Debit
1.03% + $0.15 ($0.35 max)
0.95% + $0.20 ($0.35 max)

CPS Service Station Debit
0.70% + $0.17 ($0.95 max)
0.75% + $0.17 ($0.95 max)

CPS Automated Fuel Dispenser Debit
0.70% + $0.17 ($0.95 max)
0.75% + $0.17 ($0.95 max)

Interlink PIN Debit

Visa has announced changes in the pricing for Interlink debit transactions.

Fee Program
Current Fee
April 2010 Fee

Interlink Standard— IV
0.75% + $0.17
 0.95% + $0.20

Interlink Supermarket—Performance Threshold IV
$0.25
0.95% + $0.20 ($0.35 max)

Interlink Standard—Fuel
0.70% + $0.17 ($0.95 max)
0.75% + $0.17 ($0.95 max)

Interlink Quasi Cash
1.80% + $0.10
2.30% + $0.10


If there are no price incentives for merchants to accept PIN (and staring in July 2010 "No Signature Required” <$25 for most). what will they do?  Will merchants continue to invest in PIN pads, encryption upgrades, maintenance, etc.?  Will merchants continue to ask their customers… “credit” or “debit” at the points of sale?  

What do you think?

For more Interchange announcements visit http://www.vantagecard.com/price/interchange05.html.

Share it!

If you like this article then share it with your friends and peers.

Visa's Debit Rates ConvergeTweet This!Digg It!TechnoratiBizSugar!

Visa has announced additions to the CPS/Small Ticket Interchange Program, currently available to Local Commuter Transport, Taxicabs and Limousine, Restaurants, Fast Food Restaurants, Parking Lots and Garages, Motion Picture Theaters, Video Rental Stores, Bus Lines, Tolls and Bridge Fees, News Dealers, Laundries, Dry Cleaners, Quick Copy, Car Wash and Service Stations.

Effective October 2010, Small Ticket Interchange will be extended to most merchant category codes (MCCs).  Current Small Ticket Interchange applies to transactions less than $15.  The current Visa Small Ticket Credit Interchange is 1.65% + $0.04 and the Visa Small Ticket Debit Interchange is 1.55% + $0.04.

This is an effective reduction in the overall Interchange costs for most merchant categories.  However, few merchants will benefit since there is no difference between a transaction over or under $15 in their current merchant account contract.  Bundled, blended, “rate as low as” pricing structures, where merchants pay non-qualified surcharges, will be unable to realize lower costs on transactions that meet this revised Visa Interchange category.  Instead, their merchant services provider will retain these incentives. 

See the list of merchants that are not eligible at http://www.vantagecard.com/price/interchange05.html, where you can also view the most recent Interchange announcements and the past 5-year history of Interchange changes.  For all merchants who are eligible, it is highly recommended that they shop service providers and switch to an Interchange pricing plan prior to October 2009.  For an instant merchant Interchange rate quote visit MerchantRates.com. 

Share it!

If you like this article then share it with your friends and peers.

Visa extends Small Ticket Interchange to more MerchantsTweet This!Digg It!TechnoratiBizSugar!

Buyers need not only an understanding of the benefits and value of what you are selling, they also need clearly stated billing, return, shipping and other policies important in their decision making process. This guide will focus on the essentials of a card payment refund policy:

  • Setting a Return Policy
  • Refund Best Practices
  • Handling Refund related Chargebacks
  • Beware of Refund Scams
  • Lower costs with Credit Voucher Interchange

Setting a Return Policy

A good return policy can help close sales. Your return policy or lack thereof can justify higher or lower cost as reflected by higher or lower risk of buying from you in the mind of your customer. Your return policy can even define your brand - think Nordstrom.

Handling refund requests in a way that makes good business sense and achieves 100% customer satisfaction is the goal. Consider your options. Will you offer a full refund, in-store credit, exchange only, or are all sales final? The complexity of your return policies will vary depending on your business.

Consider what you sell and who your customers are when establishing a return policy. Begin by reflecting on the value of the goods or services you are selling. Will you require the original sales receipt? Are there any time or condition requirements for acceptable returns? Who pays return shipping? Put yourself in the customer’s position and test your policy by getting feedback from friends and family. How would you feel about doing business under these conditions? Will your policy seem fair and make sense to your customer?

A store credit towards a future purchase is common and seen as an acceptable policy to many buyers. An alternative use of gift cards is to issue them for awarding in store credits. Gift cards can be a great way to retain revenues and provide customer convenience.

Refund Best Practices

Once you have developed your return policies, do not bury them deep within your web site or in the fine print. Be open and up front. Accepting card payments is a convenience form of payment, not a guaranteed form of payment. All the rules and regulations are written in favor of the cardholders. Therefore, it’s very important to protect your interest with these best practices:

  • The most important thing you can do is to document that the cardholder was aware of and agreed to your return policy. Specifically, the cardholder's signature must appear on the sales receipt near the cardholder’s signature line. This is especially important if your policy is “All Sales Final”. Make sure that this phrase is clearly disclosed on the sales receipt near the customer signature line. The cardholder's signature should also be obtained next to your refund policy disclosure printed on any related document, such as a contract, invoice or customer agreement.
  • Merchants may post their return policy at the point of sale visible to customers, on their web site, in a catalog or verbally on the phone; however, evidence of proper disclosure requires the cardholder signature.
  • The best practice for online transactions is to include your refund policy automatically as part of the check-out process. Use a “click to agree” button or have your customer type their initials next to your refund policy disclosure before completing the transaction indicating that they agree to your policies.
  • If a return is as allowed by your company's return policy, make sure your managers are trained to issue a credit to the same card account that was used for the original transaction. A best practice is to staple a copy of the original sales receipt to the refund receipt highlighting the matching last 4 digits of each card number for your records. Do not refund cash when a credit card was used. Without an offsetting credit, the card issuing bank has no evidence of a refund and may still pursue to have a chargeback reverse the sale. In this case, you run the risk of having two refunds processed.
  • If the item's value is particularly high, the best practice is to request that the buyer return the item to you first, according to your refund or exchange policy. A best practice recommendation is to require that your customers obtain a return merchandise authorization (RMA) number that you supply before they send the item back to you. Additional requirements help to prevent frivolous returns.
  • If a refund is mistakenly issued to the wrong card, it is best to VOID the transaction. If the error has already become a settled transaction then contact your merchant services provider and request that the credit be reversed. Do not attempt to offset the credit by running a sale.
  • Be cautious with gift returns. In cases where a gift recipient has returned a gift, the best policy is to offer an in-store credit or exchange. Do not return cash. Retain your documentation in case the cardholder claims a credit was not issued to his or her account for the gift.
  • If a customer is requesting a refund but you are unclear if you’ve been paid for a card sale, contact your merchant services provider. Once you have confirmed that you have not been paid for the sale transaction, the best practice is to instruct the cardholder to contact his issuing bank.

Handling refund related chargebacks

Because card payments are subject to chargebacks, refund requests that go unaddressed, or are not handled in a way that is satisfactory to your customers, can lead to chargeback disputes. A chargeback means that the amount of the original card sale that was deposited into your business checking account is taken back out. In disputes, payment card issuers will look to see how clearly your policies are stated to the cardholder. Is it reasonable to expect that they purchased with full knowledge of your return policy? And the key to this is the signature evidence next to your refund policy disclosure.

Note that if you maintain a policy such as “No Refunds” or “All Sales Final” the product or service is still expected to work as advertised and be what was ordered; otherwise, merchants still face "Not as Described" chargebacks. "Not as Described" chargebacks are most common due to defective merchandise or service disputes.

Quick Reference Helpful Hints:

  • Make customers aware of return policies and procedures.
  • If a customer disputes a transaction for this reason, they must first attempt to resolve with you. Always keep full detail and accurate records.
  • Insure package delivery for breakage.

“Credit not processed” chargebacks occur when the cardholder alerts their issuing bank that they have requested and are due a refund which has not been credited. In some instances, a merchant issues a credit voucher yet it has not appeared on the customer's online or card statement.

Quick Reference Helpful Hints:

  • Always put the return policy near the signature line of the sale receipt (signage at the point of sale is not enough to meet the rules and regulations of the card association).
  • Never give card payment credits in cash or check.
  • Never give credits on items if you are unsure if the sale was made from your merchant account or if it has been paid to you. Customers presenting their credit card statements or print outs from their bank are not presenting sufficient evidence, and in these cases you should instruct your customer to contact their card issuer with a dispute.

If a credit is issued to the cardholder before you receive a chargeback notice, respond to the chargeback with your documentation that a credit has already been granted.

If the chargeback is initiated before you issue a credit (customer contacts their issuing bank before contacting you) then respond with documentation containing signature evidence that the cardholder agreed to your return policy. Also indicate whether or not the cardholder has followed your return procedures or if they have returned or are still in possession of your goods or services rendered. If you agree to the refund in this instant, you should accept the chargeback. Do not issue a credit on top of a chargeback as this will create a duplicate “refund”.

Beware of Refund Scams

Make sure that end-of-day batch reports match the deposit to your bank. If a refund is present within a batch total then make sure there is supporting documentation for the refund. A best practice is at least a monthly audit of all refund transactions – matching original card sales and card numbers to approved refunds and card numbers.

When available on your point of sale device, password-protect the refund function. Only allow managers to perform card holder credits. And beware of employee theft! Elaborate criminal embezzlement schemes from bookkeepers have been uncovered where card refunds are issued to personal or conspirator card accounts, sometimes in place of legitimate authorized customer returns and others on invented entries.

Take notice of debits to your business checking account. Make sure the debits are not a result of unauthorized refunds being processed through your merchant account. If you notice suspicious refunds to credit cards then contact your merchant services provider immediately. With the help of the card issuing fraud department, they may be able to determine if the card being refunded has a pattern of fraudulent refund activity.

Lower cost with Credit Voucher Interchange

One way to lower your bottom line costs of accepting credit and debit card payments is to have the credit voucher Interchange returned when you process cardholder credits. Don’t overlook merchant rate savings from cardholder returns. Credit Voucher Interchange should be returned to the merchant when credits are processed. In doing so, the original fees billed for processing the card sale are offset by the return of fees back to the merchant when a refund is issued on the card.

Merchants should check their merchant processing statements, calculate their annual cardholder return volume and identify how they are billed for processing cardholder returns. Don’t leave savings from credit voucher Interchange on the table. Merchants should seek a direct Interchange pass through billing from their merchant account provider. However, not all Interchange pass through rate programs are the same and many do not return the credit voucher Interchange. Get a quote now at http://merchantrates.com to see the Visa, MasterCard and Discover card credit voucher Interchange rates.

Share it!

If you like this article then share it with your friends and peers.

The Essential Merchant Guide to Card Payment RefundsTweet This!Digg It!TechnoratiBizSugar!

Reward credit cards are used by card companies to compete with one another for the business of affluent consumers. Card issuers attempt to influence the purchase behaviors of cardholders with higher spending limits by rewarding them to spend more at merchant locations. And by most accounts they have been successful.

This spring marks the 5th anniversary of rewards Interchange. The decision to implement a higher rate for a rewards card verses a non-rewards card was introduced in response to a growing American Express market share. The competitive landscape in 2005 found MasterCard and Visa card issuers increasingly using rewards as a key component of their cardholder acquisition strategies in order to compete with AmEx for affluent consumers.

So in April 2005, both MasterCard and Visa established new reward card Interchange rate categories. Visa launched two card programs, Visa Traditional Rewards and Visa Signature, both with higher Interchange rates. The swiped CPS Rewards 1 Interchange rate was set at 1.65% + $0.10. Five years later that rate remains unchanged. What has changed is that there are more reward cards in the market. Issuing reward cards to more and more consumers has resulted in an overall increase in Interchange expenses for merchants.

Today reward credit cards are the new norm. And one frequently asked question we hear is why the costs of “reward” incentives are passed on to the retailer?  Yet merchants only directly cover a portion of the actual reward benefit by paying slightly higher Interchange rates. Yes rates are higher but not high enough to cover all of the costs of the reward level which is mandated by the card companies in order for a credit card to qualify as a reward card.

In order to earn the higher Interchange from a reward card, the card issuer is required to meet an established rewards value threshold. This is the value that is returned to cardholders. In 2005, the minimum rewards value for a Visa Traditional Rewards card was to exceed 62 basis points while Visa Signature cards required 125 basis points as the minimum reward value.

This minimum value exceeds what merchants contribute. For example, on a Visa Traditional Rewards card, the merchant’s portion is only 11 basis points of the minimum reward value a card issuer must award -- the difference between a regular credit card (1.54% + 10 cents) and a rewards credit card (1.65% + 10 cents). Or put in other terms, the incremental costs to a retailer of accepting this rewards card is $1.10 per $1,000 in sales.

In fact, this is a common argument against rewards. Most articles talk about reward cards costing as much as 1% more than the cost of accepting standard credit cards and suggest that small local retailers often pay an even greater percentage. While unfortunately this may be true in some cases, it doesn’t need to be the case. Because most merchants are not on direct Interchange pass through, they face very expensive “Non-Qualified” surcharges. However, this is a completely different problem and not a case against reward cards.

All merchants would benefit from a merchant Interchange rate quote where a pass through pricing structure reduces the costs of reward card acceptance; especially for small merchants, where the real lesson on the 5th anniversary of reward card Interchange is to simply pay the reward Interchange - not “non-qualified” surcharge fees.

In a recent NY Times article, The Damage of Card Rewards, the author worries about being a “selfish consumer” because paying with a reward credit card creates a “a sort of reverse Robin Hood problem”, where the poor (apparently defined as people without a rewards credit card) pay subsidies to finance the rewards of the affluent.

From my viewpoint I don’t see the relatively small incremental increase in costs from credit to rewards credit as a major societal issue. Certainly it is not an issue requiring drastic measures like the TX wine shop referenced in the article who “offers a 5 percent discount to customers who use cash.’’ It appears that this merchant is operating on misinformation on the costs of credit and credit rewards.

While the debate will continue over the value of payment card acceptance and the associated costs; merchants, the media, the political class and the providers of merchant services would all be better served by having a greater understanding of the history and intricacies of the payment system.

Share it!

If you like this article then share it with your friends and peers.

The Fifth Anniversary of Reward Card InterchangeTweet This!Digg It!TechnoratiBizSugar!

Debit Network Fee Updates

Posted on January 12, 2010 03:07 by Ty Hardison

NYCE and CU24 PIN debit networks have announced modifications to the current rates. 

Effective February 1, 2010 NYCE will implement the following changes:

  • The switch fee will be decreased from $0.05 to $0.0425.

  • Retail merchants will be billed at 0.75% + $0.2125 per transaction. The minimum transaction fee will be decreased to $0.3025.

  • Quick Service Restaurant merchants will be billed at 0.55% + $0.1075 per transaction with a maximum fee of $0.5425. The minimum transaction fee will be decreased to $0.2275.

  • Supermarket merchants will be decreased to $0.3025.

  • Petroleum merchants will be billed at 0.85% + $0.1925 per transaction. The minimum transaction fee will be decreased to $0.3025.

  • Returns will be decreased to $0.0425 per transaction.

  • PINless Utility merchants will be billed at $0.6550 per transaction.

  • PINless Cable merchants will continue to be assessed 1.00% + $0.125 per transaction. The maximum transaction fee will be increased to $1.055.

In addition, Effective April 1, 2010:

  • NYCE will implement a Premier Issuer fee of $0.011 per transaction. This will be an addition to the existing interchange fees.

Effective February 1, 2010 CU24 will implement the following changes:

  • The switch fee will be increased from $0.025 to $0.028.

  • Retail merchants will be billed at 0.75% + $0.178 per transaction with a maximum fee of $0.828.

  • Quick Service Restaurant merchants will be billed at 1.25% + $0.058 per transaction with a maximum fee of $0.478.

  • Supermarket merchants will now be billed $0.258 per transaction.

  • Drug Store and Pharmacy merchants will be billed at 0.75% + $0.178 per transaction with a maximum fee of $0.828.

  • Petroleum merchants will be billed at 0.75% + $0.168 per transaction with a maximum fee of $0.728.

  • Returns will now be billed $0.028 per transaction.

Share it!

If you like this article then share it with your friends and peers.

Debit Network Fee UpdatesTweet This!Digg It!TechnoratiBizSugar!

April 2010 Interchange Adjustments

Posted on January 11, 2010 16:06 by Ty Hardison

MasterCard and Visa have announced New April 2010 Interchange adjustments. 

MasterCard

Currently, MasterCard's Assessment fee is 0.095%. MasterCard will increase the Assessment fee to 0.110%.

While new rates have not yet been announced, MasterCard is introducing new Interregional Interchange programs for:

  • MasterCard World Card
  • MasterCard World Elite
  • World MasterCard for Business
  • MasterCard Corporate World
  • World Elite MasterCard Business
  • MasterCard Corporate World Elite

Effective April 2010, MasterCard is revising the qualification criteria for Commercial Face to Face and Commercial Data Rate II.  Zero will no longer be accepted as a valid tax value to qualify for these Interchange rate categories.  If a commercial transaction has no sales tax, the transaction will downgrade to the next best Interchange level.

MasterCard is also adding a new Interchange program for MasterCard Enhanced Small Business. Pricing for the new program categories will be announced once released.

  • MasterCard BusinessCard Card
  • MasterCard Professional Card
  • MasterCard Executive BusinessCard Card

Visa

Visa is implementing modifications to the No Signature Required program:

  • MCC 5993 (Cigar Stores/Stands) is being added as an eligible MCC
  • Standardize amount to equal to or less than US $25.00 to be eligible.
  • Transaction with cash back amounts will not be eligible.

Vantage has tracked changes and updates to Interchange each spring and fall since 2005.   Track Interchange changes or read recent Interchange history at http://www.vantagecard.com/price/interchange05.html.

Share it!

If you like this article then share it with your friends and peers.

April 2010 Interchange AdjustmentsTweet This!Digg It!TechnoratiBizSugar!